• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Codes Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare (1487); Scratched Material (3020)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/13/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was prepped by the technician with no issues.The lens was inserted, in the right eye, by the surgeon when a scratch down the middle of the lens was noticed.The iol was cut into pieces and removed.Another iol of the same model and diopter was inserted with no issues.There was no reported issue with the lens sticking or advancing during implantation; however, the surgeon said there was a little resistance during insertion.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 7/13/2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.The complaint lens was received inside of a specimen cup.The complaint handpiece was received loose in a bag.A patient sticker was received as well.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut into three pieces.The pieces were cleaned and, one piece was observed to be scratched.No further issues were identified.Visual inspection of the handpiece revealed that it was received with the plunger rod fully advanced.The external assembly of the handpiece revealed that there were no gaps that could contribute to the difficulty of use.The plunger rod could also be observed to be bent, in a way consistent with a handpiece that was dropped.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key14891296
Report Number3012236936-2022-01731
Device Sequence Number14724893
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731677
UDI-Public(01)05050474731677(17)240515
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/15/2024
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0160
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/13/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/14/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/01/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/15/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight98 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-