• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES ESHEATH PLUS INTRODUCER SHEATH; INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES ESHEATH PLUS INTRODUCER SHEATH; INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 916ESPA
Device Problem Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 06/08/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
As reported by a field clinical specialist (fcs), during the procedure of a 29 mm sapien 3 valve in the aortic position via transfemoral approach, a very difficult access and heavy calcium with tortuosity was noted before the case began.The first sheath scrapped the calcium and would not advance.The patient required cutdown with multiple passes of balloon angioplasty and shockwave to iliac to advance sheath.An angiogram showed perforation of right external iliac artery, covered stent placed before esheath would fully advance.After covered stents placed, new esheath advanced fully and smoothly.Valve and delivery system advanced and deployed successfully.After esheath removal, final angiogram showed dissection proximal to covered stents, so deployed self expanding stents.During procedure, patient became hypotensive due to blood loss, was transfused with blood during procedure.Patient transferred stable to recovery unit.It is unclear exactly what the cause of the perforation.The operator tried to advance the sheath, then did multiple balloon and shockwave passes and it was not until after that we did an angiogram to identify the perforation.It was suspected that it was after one of the post dilation of balloon to the iliac, but it is unclear if it was directly from the sheath, or from ballooning the artery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for correction and additional information base on the device evaluation.The following sections of this report have been updated: corrected d2 common device name.Corrected h.6 component codes and investigation conclusions and added new information to h.6 type of investigation and investigation findings.The esheath plus was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.Without the device returned for evaluation, visual inspection, functional testing, and dimensional analysis were unable to be completed.A device history record review (dhr) was performed and did not reveal any manufacturing nonconformance that would have contributed to this complaint event.A review of the lot history revealed no other similar returned complaints for the trend categories.The instructions were reviewed instruction for use (ifu) for esheath plus ifu, device preparation manual, procedural training manual and no ifu/training deficiencies were identified.The complaint was unable to be confirmed as there was no returned imagery nor returned device.Additionally with no returned device, engineering was unable to be perform additional visual inspection or functional/dimensional testing.Therefore, a manufacturing non-conformance could not be identified.Reviews of the dhr and lot history showed no indication a manufacturing non-conformance contributed to the event.No ifu/training manual deficiencies were identified.As reported, "very difficult access and heavy calcium with tortuosity was noted before the case began".Tortuosity can create sub-optimal angles for navigating the sheath while interaction with heavy calcium can create added friction, stopping the sheath from advancing.Available information suggests patient factors (calcification, tortuosity) could have contributed to the event.However, a definite root cause could not be determined at this time.Since no product non-conformances or ifu/training deficiencies were identified during evaluation, a product risk assessment (pra) escalation or a corrective preventative action (capa) is not required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESHEATH PLUS INTRODUCER SHEATH
Type of Device
INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key14895675
MDR Text Key295225850
Report Number2015691-2022-06608
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K200258
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/01/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/20/2024
Device Model Number916ESPA
Device Lot Number64190940
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/20/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-