| Model Number |
G14274 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
03/22/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Initial reporter occupation: office administration.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, a open-end ureteral catheter broke while inside a sheath.Additional patient and event information has been requested.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event description: as reported, a open-end ureteral catheter broke while inside a sheath.Investigation - evaluation.Reviews of complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu) and quality control data were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed; however, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing and quality control documents was conducted.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to to assure functionality and device integrity prior to shipping.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: precautions avoid bending or kinking the catheter prior to placement.Doing so could damage the integrity of the catheter and result in patient injury.If you encounter resistance while advancing or withdrawing the catheter, stop.Determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.The potential effects of phthalates on children or pregnant or nursing women have not been fully characterized and there may be concern for reproductive and developmental effects.Do not withdraw catheter while deflected in cystoscope/endoscope.Due to a lack of information around the sequence of events, cook has concluded that a cause for the complaint cannot be established.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event description: as reported, a open-end ureteral catheter broke while inside a sheath.Investigation - evaluation: reviews of complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu) and quality control data were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the device was also conducted.One device was returned with only a label indicating lot 14426715.The catheter was returned in two pieces.The first segment measured approximately 14.3cm.The second segment with the adapter attached measured approximately 56.5cm.The point of separation was an angled cut approximately 1.5cm long.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing and quality control documents was conducted.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to to assure functionality and device integrity prior to shipping.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: precautions: avoid bending or kinking the catheter prior to placement.Doing so could damage the integrity of the catheter and result in patient injury.If you encounter resistance while advancing or withdrawing the catheter, stop.Determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.The potential effects of phthalates on children or pregnant or nursing women have not been fully characterized and there may be concern for reproductive and developmental effects.Do not withdraw catheter while deflected in cystoscope/endoscope.Due to a lack of information around the sequence of events, cook has concluded that a cause for the complaint cannot be established.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|