|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient, however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient, however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-aug-2019) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2020.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against ventralight st.It is alleged that the patient sustained unspecified injury and experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2020 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralight st mesh.Per operative notes, ¿large midline ventral hernia was identified.Hernia sac was dissected free from surrounding tissues and ventralight st mesh was placed around the defect tacked and sutured to fascia.¿ attornery alleges adhesion and pain.
|