| Model Number |
AES-50SL |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/11/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported device is being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the device evaluation and complaint investigation.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The distributor reported on behalf of the customer that the device, aes-50sl, arthroscopic energy 50 degree probe with suction 18 cm was being used on (b)(6) 2022 during an arthroscopy procedure and " the radiofrequency tip was put for its use which in the first moment normal function and in the second burned the head of the tip came out annoying the surgeon asked me q solve the problem he proceeded to pass the tip of 90 and told me q if but q only billed one x q the tip has been damaged from factory annoying the cx x q lost time in rescuing the foreign object in the articulation q as it could happen that if they were just using it.(broken tip)¿.The procedure was completed with an alternate unknown device.There was no impact or injury to the patient or user.There was no report of medical intervention or any prolonged hospitalization for the patient.A good faith effort was made to obtain information; however, to date no reply has been received.This report is being raised on the basis of malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Update: clarification of the event description was received on (b)(6) 2022."the radiofrequency tip was used the first time without problem.The second time used, the head tip came off.The surgeon was annoyed and ask him to solve the problem.He proceeded to give a 90-degree tip and the surgeon accepted.The surgeon also asked him to only bill one.The annoyed surgeon claims the tip came damage from factory and he lost time retrieving the foreign object from the joint.He questioned how this could happen since he was starting to use the product." the distributor reported on behalf of the customer that the device, aes-50sl, arthroscopic energy 50 degree probe with suction 18 cm was being used on 11jun22 during an arthroscopy procedure and " the radiofrequency tip was put for its use which in the first moment normal function and in the second burned the head of the tip came out annoying the surgeon asked me q solve the problem he proceeded to pass the tip of 90 and told me q if but q only billed one x q the tip has been damaged from factory annoying the cx x q lost time in rescuing the foreign object in the articulation q as it could happen that if they were just using it.(broken tip)¿.The procedure was completed with an alternate unknown device.There was no impact or injury to the patient or user.There was no report of medical intervention or any prolonged hospitalization for the patient.A good faith effort was made to obtain information; however, to date no reply has been received.This report is being raised on the basis of malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Examination of the device found device electrode detached from the probe tip.Detached electrode was not returned for evaluation.Returned condition of device shows device was previously used.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.This is the only complaint for this lot number and failure mode within the past two years.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 51 reports, regarding 57 devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame 189,735 devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be 0.0003.Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: maintain the probe tip, including the return electrode, in the field of view at all times.Injuries to the patient may result from inadvertent activation or movement of an activated probe outside the field of view.Do not activate the probe while any portion of the active or return electrode is in contact with another metal object, including the scope; localized heating of the electrode and the adjacent metal object may result in product damage and/or injury.Electrodes and probes of monitoring, stimulating, and imaging devices can provide paths for high frequency currents even if they are battery powered, insulated, or isolated at 50/60 hz.This issue will continue to be monitored through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|