• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Difficult to Insert (1316)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/06/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) possibly had a bent/ broken haptic.Account indicated that the leading haptic was protruding too far.The lens was inserted into the patient's left eye; however, the surgeon was unable to seat the lens properly.The iol was removed from the eye.Another lens of the same model and diopter power was placed without any incident.The original iol was discarded.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Implant date: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Explant date: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.The device was not returned for analysis as it was discarded.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain the missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: following information was obtained from the patient label received along with the sample at the investigation label: section a2: date of birth: (b)(6)1956.Section b5: the first name of the surgeon was (b)(6).Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: jul 13, 2022 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.No iol was received as part of this return, therefore no product evaluation could be performed on the lens.Visual inspection under magnification of the handpiece revealed that it was received with the plunger rod fully advanced.The cartridge tip could be observed to be bent, in a way consistent with a handpiece that was dropped.The external assembly was inspected and, no issues that could cause or contribute to positioning issues during implantation could be identified.Conclusion: the reported complaint issues could not be confirmed, therefore cold not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.As no lens was returned there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key14951356
Report Number3012236936-2022-01793
Device Sequence Number5396312
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731547
UDI-Public(01)05050474731547(17)240419
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/19/2024
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0095
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/14/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/18/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/07/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/19/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-