|
|
| Model Number |
466F220A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Unintended Movement (3026)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Easy Bruising (4558); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Occupation: other, senior counsel, litigation.Please note that the exact event date is unknown and the event date is the complaint awareness date.It was reported that a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilt.The indication for the filter implant, procedural details and medical history of the patient have not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with operator technique and vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without images available for review the reported event could not be confirmed or further clarified.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.Please note that this is the initial report for this product.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to filter tilt.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
After further review of additional information received, the following sections have been updated accordingly: a2, b3, b4, b5, d1, d4, d10, g2, g3, g6, h1, h2, h4 and h6.It was reported that a patient underwent placement of an optease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused filter tilt.The patient reported becoming aware of the event approximately eleven years and two months post implant.The patient also reported stress and lower back pain related to the filter.According to the medical record the filter was implanted via the right common femoral vein and deployed into the infrarenal area.The patient tolerated the procedure well.The indication for the filter placement was not documented in the medical records and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product remains implanted and unavailable for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The optease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with operator technique and vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without images available for review the reported event could not be confirmed or further clarified.Stress and low back pain does not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues or other undisclosed comorbidities.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received per the medical records indicate that the filter was implanted via the patient's right common femoral vein.The filter was deployed into the infrarenal area.The patient tolerated the procedure well.Additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced filter tilt.The patient became aware of the reported event approximately eleven years and two months after the index procedure.The patient continues to experience stress and lower back pain related to the filter.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|