| Model Number |
7360000 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Insert (1316); Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/14/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 04/2023).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the connection between the peel away and dilator allegedly lack smooth transition area.The patient allegedly experienced pain at the neck site.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be no longer reportable.Since an initial mdr was submitted, therefore, the file will remain assessed as a malfunction.H10: d4 (expiry date: 04/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the connection between the peel away and dilator allegedly lack smooth transition area.The patient allegedly experienced pain at the neck site.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: additional information was received and the reportability was reassessed as malfunction.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 04/2023), g3, h6 (method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the connection between the peel away and dilator allegedly lack smooth transition area.It was further reported that the patient allegedly had bruise on the right side of the neck.It was further reported that the patient experienced pain at the bruise site.Reportedly, the pain was treated with an ice pack and tylenol.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|