• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPODJ60
Device Problems Material Deformation (2976); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/15/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the splenic artery using pod packing coils (pod pcs), a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), and an angiographic catheter.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted six coils and two pod pcs.While advancing the next pod pc through the lantern, the coil unintentionally detached.Upon removal, the physician kinked the pod pc pusher wire.Therefore, the lantern containing the detached pod pc was removed from the patient and the pod pc was flushed out on the back table.The procedure was completed using another pod pc of the same size, the same lantern, and the same angiographic catheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned pod pc confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Further evaluation revealed that the pull wire was in its initial position within the pusher assembly ddt, and the embolization coils proximal constraint sphere was inside the ddt.If the pod pc is retracted against resistance, the embolization coils stretch resistant (sr) component may fracture, and the embolization coil will detach.This damage likely contributed to the unintentional detachment.Further evaluation revealed that the pet lock was separated, the pusher assembly was fractured, and the pull tube was bent on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and likely occurred during the post procedure.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD PACKING COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key15041299
MDR Text Key304679705
Report Number3005168196-2022-00338
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017679
UDI-Public814548017679
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K170852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,08/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPODJ60
Device Lot NumberF108655
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/11/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received07/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/25/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-