• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO NC EUPHORA RX; CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY,

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO NC EUPHORA RX; CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, Back to Search Results
Model Number NCEUP3520X
Medical Device Problem Code Deflation Problem (1149)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/08/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
An attempt was made to use one nc euphora rx ptca balloon catheter to treat a lesion located in the ostium of the right coronary artery (rca).The device was inspected with no issues noted.Negative prep was performed with no issues noted.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did pass through a previously-deployed stent.Resistance was not encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during delivery.It was reported that deflation difficulties occurred at the lesion site following inflation.It was detailed that the balloon was inflated and deflated multiple times within the vessel.On the final inflation, the balloon would not deflate in the ostium of the rca.It was stated that an attempt was made to dislodge the balloon and advance the guide catheter over the balloon however, these attempts were unsuccessful.The in-deflator was then removed and a syringe attached, the balloon would still not deflate.The guide catheter was placed near the balloon and everything was removed together through the radial artery.No surgery or intervention were required.The patient was reported to be alive with no injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: the patient presented to hospital with a st elevated myocardial infarction (stemi).The protective sheath and packaging stylette were removed with no difficulties.The device was not moved or repositioned while inflated.The balloon failed to deflate.The physician had a wire across the lesion in the rca that was causing the heart attack, and asked for the nc euphora balloon to push the plaque against the artery wall.The deflation difficulty occurred on the third or fourth inflation.Many attempts were made to deflate the balloon.It was stated that an attempt was made to dislodge the balloon by advancing the guide catheter over the balloon, however, these attempts were unsuccessful as the guide catheter would not advance.The physician did not attempt to burst the balloon.There was no difficulties noted during inflations of the the balloon.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis summary: the device returned with a non-medtronic syringe attached which was removed with no issue noted.The device also returned loaded in a non-medtronic guide catheter with a non-medtronic y-connector attached.The exposed section of the distal shaft was stretched.The proximal balloon bond was necked.The proximal marker band was not in position under the balloon working length.Deformation was evident to the distal tip.The balloon was deflated on device return.The balloon was stretched distally and folded onto itself.It was not possible to remove the guide catheter due to the condition of the balloon.No other deformation evident to the remainder of the device.Inflation or deflation testing was not possible due to the level of deformation of the device.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NC EUPHORA RX
Common Device Name
CATHETERS, TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY,
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX  22570
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX   22570
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key15050657
Report Number9612164-2022-02729
Device Sequence Number20162124
Product Code LOX
UDI-Device Identifier00643169396326
UDI-Public00643169396326
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K141090
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/01/2024
Device Model NumberNCEUP3520X
Device Catalogue NumberNCEUP3520X
Device Lot Number223728781
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/12/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/26/2022
08/29/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/19/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/10/2022
09/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age58 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-