• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Medical Device Problem Code Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Inflammation (1932); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Reportedly the user was explanted on (b)(6).2022 due to a chronic inflammation and a fistula formation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been explanted and should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event or Problem Description
In march 2022 it was reported that the magnet was too strong and a weaker magnet was ordered.On the (b)(6) 2022 there was pain when pressure was applied to the implant area and in may 2022 the user then reported a burning pain approximately one hour after putting the audio processor on.Furthermore, it was reported that the user had a chronic inflammation and granulation tissue formation in the implant bed with a persistent fistula formation through the skin.The user was explanted and re-implanted at a later date.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: device investigation did not reveal any device defect or damage, which is assumed to have been present whilst implanted.Mechanical damages found during investigation are attributable to the removal surgery.According to the information received from the field the device was explanted due to an inflammation and fistula formation above the implant site.A review of the device_s sterilization records shows that the device has been subject to a valid sterilization process, thus no information available points to the implant being the source of any infection.However, a device contribution to the chronic inflammation cannot be ruled out i.E.Presence of a too strong magnet combined with possible age-related skin condition.This is a final report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key15063188
Report Number9710014-2022-00513
Device Sequence Number20197527
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737395353
UDI-Public(01)09008737395353
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAU
PMA/510(K) Number
P000025
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/16/2023
Device Model NumberMI1250 SYNCHRONY 2
Device Catalogue Number39563
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/13/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/13/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/20/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/16/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-