• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG GAV 2.0 VALVE 10/30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG GAV 2.0 VALVE 10/30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX215T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 06/13/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: no abnormalities detected.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valve is operating within the accepted tolerance in the horizontal but not in the vertical position.The result is an accelerated outflow in the vertical position of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valve, deposits were found in gav 2.0.Results: based on our investigation, we have determined an accelerated outflow in the valve at the time of our investigation.The detected deposits could be named as the cause of the malfunction.As described in scientific literature, the problem encountered is one of the known, inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a gav 2.0 (part # fx215t) was implanted during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in underdrainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GAV 2.0 VALVE 10/30
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key15065859
Report Number3004721439-2022-00207
Device Sequence Number5628219
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906500054
UDI-Public4041906500054
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 07/20/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/11/2026
Device Model NumberFX215T
Device Catalogue NumberFX215T
Device Lot Number20051858
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/24/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/24/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/23/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age5 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight21 KG
-
-