• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZA9003
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Blurred Vision (2137); Insufficient Information (4580)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's left eye due to the patient could not see distance clearly and daily activities were significantly affected.Other disorders of the eye following cataract surgery led to explanting the lens.Pre-operative vision was 20/50 and post-op vision was 20/80.There was no vitrectomy, incision enlargement, or sutures required.The patient's post-operative outcome was not available.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient ethnicity: information unknown/not provided.Date of event: unknown/not provided.Best estimate date is on (b)(6) 2022.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: aug 18, 2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could contribute to blurry vision could not be identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issues were not confirmed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15080710
Report Number3012236936-2022-01946
Device Sequence Number17152536
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474529052
UDI-Public(01)05050474529052(17)270213
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P990080
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberZA9003
Device Catalogue NumberZA90030220
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/28/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/25/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/21/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight91 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-