| Model Number |
VERSION 1.0 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/28/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos and images were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiry date: 10/2022).Device pending return.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the catheter helix was allegedly detached from the body.It was further reported that the smear was used to retrieve the helix.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the catheter helix was allegedly detached from the body.It was further reported that the smear was used to retrieve the helix.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation.A physical investigation was performed for the catheter.The helix was broken at 2 cm from the tip of the catheter.It can be confirmed that the helix was broken.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiry date: 10/2024).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation.Photos, images and videos were provided for review.A physical investigation was performed for the catheter.The helix was broken at 2 cm from the tip of the catheter.It can be confirmed that the helix was broken.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 10/2024).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after 30 seconds of activation during a recanalization procedure in an in stent subclavian artery via femoral artery, the catheter helix allegedly detached.It was further reported that a snare was used to retrieve the helix.Reportedly, the rotating catheter head did not come in contact with any other device.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|