|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi #: (b)(4).Investigation summary: the complaint device is not being returned, it was implanted in the patient, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number (8l58119), and no non-conformance was identified.As part of depuy mitek¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.With the information provided, and without the complaint device to evaluate, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
This is report 3 of 4 for (b)(4).It was reported by the customer in china that during an acl (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction procedure on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that two plates on the truespan meniscal repair system peek 24 degree device was deployed at the same time after the first firing.Changed to another one to continue the procedure but the same thing happened again.Subsequently, two anchors: 8x23mm milagro advance interference screw and 8x30mm milagro advance interference screw devices broke off upon insertion.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|