|
EIT EMERGING IMPLANT TECHNOLOGIES GMBH IMPLANT INSERTER; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
LET30100 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/28/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from germany reports an event as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022 during a mini alif procedure (as per mayer/ l4/5 / access from the right, left lateral position), after inserting the conduit llif cage, it was not possible to detach the insertion instrument from the cage.The insertion instrument blocked the cage and it could not be released.The cage was removed with help of the implant-positioning instrument.Another freestyle cage was inserted with the help of an implant-pusher.The trial implant holder also jammed during disassembly and was blocked completely.There was no adverse patient consequence, surgery was delayed for approximately 15 minutes.There is no further information.This report is for an implant inserter.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Initial reporter is a synthes employee.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: d2: date of concomitant therapy is (b)(6) 2022.H6: part: let30100.Lot: e19di1312.Supplier: eit.¿ batch1: released on 06 may 2020 with no discrepancies.No nonconformance reports (ncrs) were generated during production.The photo was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the device from the received image(s).Visual analysis of the photo revealed that the implant inserter, let30100 was shown holding the implant.However a functional test to assess the unable to disassemble condition was not conducted since the device was not returned for examination.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was not confirmed for implant inserter, let30100.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Part # let30100.Lot # e19di1312.Supplier: eit.Batch1: lot units were released on 06 may 2020 with no discrepancies.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Surgery mini-alif as per mayer / l4/5 / access from the right, left lateral position: after insertion of the cage conduit llif it was not possible to detach the insertion instrument from the cage.The instrument blocked and it could not be released.The cage was removed again with help of the implant-positioning instrument.Another cage freestyle was inserted with help of an implant-pusher.No patient harm, surgery delay about 15 minutes.The trial implant holder (trial implant placement instrument) also jammed during disassembly (after surgery) and also blocked completely.The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the implant inserter had the cage stuck.A dimensional inspection for the implant inserter was unable to be performed due to stuck devices.A functional test was performed, the device had the inner shaft end cap stuck with no movement at all, additionally it had the cage llif hi h 12mm 8deg 50/22 stuck on the distal tip.The complaint condition was able to be replicated.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the implant inserter would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed: the following drawings reflecting the current and manufactured revisions were reviewed: let30100 rev.B / rev.B.Dimensional inspection: device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|