|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
As reported, prior to patient contact and during a procedure involving embolization of an intracranial aneurysm in a previously hospitalized patient, the tip of a flexor raabe guiding sheath was found to be separated.The separated tip was found when the user opened the device packaging; therefore, the device was not used.The device was replaced with another sheath, and the procedure was continued.There were no adverse effects to the patient.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, prior to patient contact and during a procedure involving embolization of an intracranial aneurysm in a previously hospitalized patient, the tip of a flexor raabe guiding sheath was found to be separated.The separated tip was found when the user opened the device packaging; therefore, the device was not used.The device was replaced with another sheath, and the procedure was continued.There were no adverse effects to the patient.Corrected information: h6 (annex a and g) - the investigation of this complaint deemed this to be a hub issue with the device, not a tip issue as originally reported.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The product ifu states ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ the information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and ifu, as well as consultation with manufacturing quality engineering suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured out of specification; however, there is no evidence of additional non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a quality control deficiency contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|