| Catalog Number |
03.507.003 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/30/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in japan as follows: it was reported that this was an orif for treating cheek bone fracture on (b)(6) 2022.After the surgeon made a burr hole with the handle and the reduction tool, reduction was attempted in the lesion.Next, he tried to extract the handle and the reduction tool from the burr hole.However, the reduction tool did not turn while only the handle turned idly.He took troubleshooting and finally managed to extract them less than 30-minute surgical delay.According to the surgeon, he used a plier to extract the devices during the troubleshooting.The use of the plier left some scratches on the reduction tool¿s tapping.No further information is available.This report is for one (1)thread reduc tool ø3.5 self-tap l78 w/he.This is report 2 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation but has yet to be received.Postal code (b)(6).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Investigation summary: the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that there was no damage or defects with the thread reduc tool ø3.5 self-tap l78 w/he.No a dimensional inspection was performed for the thread reduc tool ø3.5 self-tap l78 w/he since no defect was found as part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the thread reduc tool ø3.5 self-tap l78 w/he was found to have no damage or defects.No definitive root cause could be determined.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review: part # 03.507.003, synthes lot # pe03381: a review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|