|
At the time of the original investigation, minerva surgical reached out to the fda to obtain additional information, such as user facility.However, the fda could not disclose any additional information which would aid in continuing the investigation further.Uterine/bowel perforations are known complications of endometrial ablation.Complications associated with perforations are addressed in the warning section of the operator's manual and instructions for use, including the statements: use caution not to perforate the uterine wall when sounding, dilating, or inserting the disposable handpiece.Activation of the minerva disposable handpiece in the setting of a uterine perforation is likely to result in serious patient injury.Excessive force applied during placement of the disposable handpiece may result in tissue injury, including perforation.Although designed to detect a perforation of the uterine wall, this test is an indicator only, and it might not detect all perforations.Clinical judgment must always be used.Post-treatment, any patient-reporting signs/symptoms that could indicate a serious complication, e.G., bowel injury, should be thoroughly evaluated without delay.As with all endometrial ablation procedures, serious injury or death can occur, including but not limited to, infection and injury to adjacent tissue, such as bowel, bladder, vagina, vulva, and/or perineum.There were no reports of system errors during the procedure.Since both the identification of the device(s) involved and the user facility is not known, the disposable handpiece and controller used in this case were not available to be returned; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.
|
|
Manufacturer periodically reviews the maude database for potential complaints and adverse events related to its commercialized medical devices.During one of these maude database reviews, maude report # (b)(4) was identified as a potential reportable event.This report is filed using the mandatory medwatch reporting program and therefore the same event (described in this report) will appear twice on the maude database.As originally reported in the maude report, "surgeon reported approximately 1 week after surgery that patient sustained a thermal injury to her rectosigmoid junction during an endometrial ablation.This resulted in a low anterior resection with proctocolo anastomosis.Surgeon reports that before the energy was delivered during the ablation, the minerva device passed both pre-tests as it tries to detect any defects in the uterus.Afterward it is his normal procedure to visualize the ablated area with the camera, and in doing so, he discovered the minerva device penetrated through the patient's uterus and likely burned the patient's colon with delivery.Physician is unsure if this issue was a result of a device failure." minerva surgical made multiple attempts to obtain additional information.These attempts were unsuccessful since no identifiable information was available to properly investigate the incident.Based on the information available, there was no report of the event having been previously received from the user facility.Although no investigation was possible and no new or additional information is available when compared to the maude reports submitted by the unknown user facility, this report fulfills the manufacturer's responsibility to file mdr per 21cfr part 803.
|