| Model Number |
G44154 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/19/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Occupation = ir tech.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, during an "angio" of the right leg, the tip of a flexor ansel guiding sheath tore.Resistance was reportedly encountered upon advancement of the device over an unspecified 0.035 stiff angled glidewire, and the device reportedly bent.Upon removal of the device, it was noted that the tip was torn.The anatomy was mildly calcified.Another sheath was used to successfully complete the procedure without issue.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information has been requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received 26jul2022 and was inadvertently omitted from the initial report.The hydrophilic coating had been activated.Access was obtained in the femoral artery.The sheath had not been advanced far when resistance was encountered and the device would no longer advance.Per the customer, the sheath and dilator tips were damaged and torn.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Upon return and evaluation of the device on 23aug2022, the sheath tip was torn.No damage was found on the dilator.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional/corrected information: b5, h6 (annex g): only the sheath tip was split.No damage was noted to the dilator.H3: device evaluated by mfg = other (81) - device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary: as reported, during an "angio" of the right leg, the tip of a flexor ansel guiding sheath tore.The hydrophilic coating had been activated.Access was obtained in the femoral artery.The sheath had not been advanced far when resistance was encountered.The device would no longer advance over an unspecified 0.035 stiff angled glidewire, and the device reportedly bent.Upon removal of the device, it was noted that the tip was torn.The anatomy was mildly calcified.Another sheath was used to successfully complete the procedure without issue.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.One kcfw-6.0-18/38-45-rb-anl0-hc was returned for investigation.The distal tip of the sheath was buckled and split.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is provided with instructions for use which warn, ¿if resistance is encountered during advancement of the flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal.¿ the ifu further states, ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that a component failure contributed to this failure mode.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per a review of the risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|