|
EIT EMERGING IMPLANT TECHNOLOGIES GMBH IMPLANT INSERTER SH CONNECTION; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
AET30101 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
07/06/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Occupation: reporter is a j&j employee.(b)(4).The photo was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Visual analysis of the photo revealed that the cage was assembled to the implant inserter sh connection, p/n: aet30101, however, a second set of photos revealed the inserter was disassembled and the tip of the inner shaft was bent.It is unclear if the devices were disassembled at any point and if the tip of the inner shaft got bent as a result.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed for implant inserter sh connection, p/n: aet30101.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: part #: aet30101; lot #: e19di1200; supplier: (b)(4); batch 1: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on 09 mar 2021 with no discrepancies.Batch 2: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on 04 jan 2021 with no discrepancies.Batch 3: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on 01 dec 2020 with no discrepancies.No ncrs were generated during production.The ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from depuy synthes reports an event in germany as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, after the alif cage was placed in the l5/s1 segment (access anterolateral from the left), surgeon removed the implant holder from the cage.After control, the conduit alif needed to be repositioned, because the position was not satisfactory as per x-ray.Again, surgeon connected implant holder to the cage for repositioning of the cage.After this procedure the implant holder was not possible to be removed from the cage.It was no longer possible to turn the knob to the right or left side (open /closed).Surgeon removed the cage holder and connected cage from the disc space l5/s1 and did alternative implantation of a tm400 competitor cage.This report is for one (1) implant inserter sh connection.This is report 1 of 2 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H6: part # aet30101, lot # e19di1200, supplier: (b)(4).Batch1: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on 09 mar 2021 with no discrepancies.Batch2: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on 04 jan 2021 with no discrepancies.Batch3: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on 01 dec 2020 with no discrepancies.No ncrs were generated during production.The ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the inner shaft of the implant inserter sh connection, p/n: aet30101, was bent.As a result the shaft was jammed inside the inserter.No other problems identified.A dimensional inspection was unable to be performed due to post-manufacturing damage.A functional test was performed.The knob on the inserter handle was turned counter clockwise to try to release the inner shaft but the it remained stuck inside the inserter.A functional test to asses the assembly with the cage was not conducted since the cage was not returned for examination.The complaint condition was not replicated.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the implant inserter sh connection, p/n: aet30101 would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: a, b5, b7, e, g2, h6: subsequent follow-up with the customer, additional information was received regarding the event.Therefore, patient information, medical history, event description, initial reporter, report source and health effect - impact code have been updated accordingly.A1: patient identifier: case id#: (b)(6).D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from depuy synthes reports an event in germany as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, after the alif cage was placed in the l5/s1 segment (access anterolateral from the left), surgeon removed the implant holder from the cage.After control, the conduit alif needed to be repositioned, because the position was not satisfactory as per x-ray.Again, surgeon connected implant holder to the cage for repositioning of the cage.After this procedure the implant holder was not possible to be removed from the cage.It was no longer possible to turn the knob to the right or left side (open / closed).Surgeon removed the cage holder and connected cage from the disc space l5/s1 and did alternative implantation of a tm400 competitor cage.There was a surgical delay in relation to the reported event of 30 minutes.There were no adverse consequence/s that affected the patient because of the reported event.There was no medical intervention required? this report is for one (1) alif hi h 16mm 15deg s.This is report 1 of 2 for complaint: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|