| Model Number |
M0068403961 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Failure to Fire (2610)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/27/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2022 that a flexiva tractip high power single use laser fiber was used during a procedure, performed on (b)(6) 2022.During the procedure, the laser fiber was connected to the laser console and upon pressing down the foot pedal it did not work.The procedure was completed with another flexiva tractip high power single use laser fiber.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.No further information has been obtained despite good faith efforts.Note: this event has been deemed reportable based on the investigation finding of laser fiber broken within the connector.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Investigation results: the returned flexiva tractip high power single-use laser fiber was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the laser fiber was returned in one piece.The fiber body measured 313.1 cm from the distal tip to the proximal end of the sma connector.The exposed glass tip measured 4 mm and was in good condition.A functional evaluation revealed that the light from the sma connector was distorted, indicating that there was fracture within the connector.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event of the flexiva tractip high power single-use laser fiber failed to emit energy was confirmed.The reported failure to emit laser energy is consistent with a fiber broken within the connector.It is likely that procedural handling of the device during set-up or use contributed to the fracture within the fiber connector.A broken fiber within the connector of the device can result in insufficient aiming beam and low laser energy output, up to a complete inability for the fiber to fire.Review and analysis of all available information indicated that the most probable root cause is adverse event related to procedure.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|