• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. MICRORAPTOR RGNSB SA UB II #1 STR BL CB; FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. MICRORAPTOR RGNSB SA UB II #1 STR BL CB; FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 72204984
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Rupture (2208); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/20/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during an arthroscopy, the microraptor anchor came off.It is unknown how the issue was solver and a non-significant surgical delay was reported.No further complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements for the material are specified, and the material must comply with provided percentage composition specifications as measured by ash test.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The shaft of the insertion device is bent toward the distal end.A small fragment of the fractured anchor was returned, there was no suture material returned.Both the insertion device and the anchor fragment have debris on them.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.The condition in which the device was received (broken) did not allow for further evaluation of the reported complaint.No relevant supporting clinical information has been provided to assist with a clinical investigation.Therefore, based on insufficient information, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed at this time.The patient's current condition is unknown and the patient impact beyond the reported events could not be determined based on the limited information provided.Should any additional clinical information be provided, this complaint will be re-evaluated.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during an arthroscopy, the microraptor anchor came off.The device broke inside the patient, all the broken pieces were removed.It is unknown how the issue was solved and a non-significant surgical delay was reported.No further complications were reported.Results of investigation reported that the device was received broken.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H2: additional information ¿h10: additional manufacturer narrative¿ h3, h6:the reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements for the material are specified, and the material must comply with provided percentage composition specifications as measured by ash test.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The shaft of the insertion device is bent toward the distal end.A small fragment of the fractured anchor was returned, there was no suture material returned.Both the insertion device and the anchor fragment have debris on them.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.The condition in which the device was received (broken) did not allow for further evaluation of the reported complaint.It was communicated that the broken pieces were retrieved from the patient.Since no further risk to the patient is anticipated no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.Corrected data: g4.The previous report (1219602-2022-01111) was sent with an incorrect date received by manufacturer.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MICRORAPTOR RGNSB SA UB II #1 STR BL CB
Common Device Name
FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15183826
Report Number1219602-2022-01111
Device Sequence Number20309796
Product Code MAI
UDI-Device Identifier00885556710319
UDI-Public00885556710319
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K180361
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/24/2024
Device Model Number72204984
Device Catalogue Number72204984
Device Lot Number2065875
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/20/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/20/2022
01/05/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/08/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/30/2022
01/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/12/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-