|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A visual inspection revealed the device was returned outside of original packaging.The anchor was returned with the device.The suture was not with the device.A functional evaluation could not be performed as anchor is detached and without suture.The sliding ring and spring functioned as intended.This case reports, the microraptor anchor came off during an arthroscopy procedure.Reportedly, there was a delay of 10 minutes and no patient injury.It is unknown how the procedure was completed.Smith and nephew has not received the requested patient specific documentation, the device, and/or adequate materials to fully evaluate the root cause of the complaint.Patient impact beyond that which was reported could not be determined.If additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.There was no relationship found between the device and the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed and the root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the product evaluation process.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|