| Model Number |
DWF364C |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Align (2522)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
07/07/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a revision surgery to seat the interface between the tray and poly properly.During initial surgery, the interface between the tray and the poly did not seat even after repeating impaction.Although, the interface appeared seated on x-ray, the snap ring did not engage.The poly was disassociated with the tray within 24 hours of the case.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Analysis results are not available at the time of this report.A follow-up report will be sent when the analysis is complete.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: please refer to d6a implant date.The reported event could be confirmed for the dissociated poly insert with the tray in post-operative but could not be confirmed with the returned device since it is conforming to specifications and fully functional.The received insert showed vertical marks-ribs all along the groove edges (due to the tray teeth when inserting the insert into the tray), which deformed slightly the insert at the groove level and punched the circlip.A functional insertion test carried out with a reversed tray available from our premises showed that the insert could correctly seat into the tray with no issue to report (no gap or insert/tray micro-motion were observed).Moreover, after being impacted, the insert was difficult to extract with an insert revision clamp.The device was still functional.The issue described in the complaint was unable to reproduce.Dimensionally, all dimensions were conforming to specifications.The residual gap between the insert and the tray remained in the acceptable tolerances.Since a postoperative x-ray taken the day after the surgery was provided, the opinion of the medical expert was requested and stated: "neither the x-ray nor the data on the dimensions of the device show any abnormalities, besides the dislocation of the pe-liner on the postoperative x-ray" (metal ring out of the tray).Unfortunately, no immediate post-operative surgery x-rays were provided for investigation to check if the insert was indeed correctly seated into the tray immediately after surgery.More detailed information about the complaint event must be available to determine the root cause of the complaint event.In this case, it is unlikely that the device found fully functional could have caused the reported event.As a reminder, the operation technique states that "the surgeon should inspect the implant tapers and mating surfaces for debris or blemishes before assembly.The tapers should be clean and dry for assembly" and that "the groove marking on the insert impactor tip must be aligned with the laser mark of the insert (12 o´clock position of the humerus)".A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If more information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a revision surgery to seat the interface between the tray and poly properly.During initial surgery, the interface between the tray and the poly did not seat even after repeating impaction.Although, the interface appeared seated on x-ray, the snap ring did not engage.The poly was disassociated with the tray within 24 hours of the case.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|