|
It was reported that the tip of an asahi gladius mongo guide wire had separated during right lower extremity angiogram to treat a heavily calcified chronic total occlusion (cto) in the right superficial femoral artery (sfa).Target lesion was heavily calcified, so there was difficulty moving the device through the lesion.When trying to retract the wire back into the non-asahi quick-cross support catheter, the wire tip separated in the heavily calcified r sfa.No attempt was made because there was no way to retrieve the tip due to the complexity of the lesion.It was unable to fix the patient's sfa due to calcified plaque burden.Procedure was abandoned due to complexity of lesion.The separated tip is stable and will not be migrating.There was no delay in the procedure due to losing the wire tip.Patient outcome unchanged due to this event.
|
|
Manufacturing site: (b)(4).The reported gladius mongo guide wire was returned for evaluation.Missing of the tip was confirmed on the returned guide wire.The fracture end of the guide wire was deformed to a loop.The fractured coil was elongated for approximately 20 mm distal to the distal-mid solder that was originally set at 27 mm from the tip.Along coil elongation, the outermost polymer jacket was also elongated and torn for approximately 20 mm distal to the solder.A few of torn small fragments of the polymer jacket remained on the elongated coil.The exposed core was fractured at approximately 20 mm distal to the solder.Fracture ends of the coil and core were microscopically observed.The fracture end of the core was found necked by tensile stress.The fracture surface of the coil was flat that indicated torsion generated as the coil was pulled to elongate had contributed to the coil fracture.Lot history review revealed no anomaly relating to the reported event.No other similar product experience report was received from this lot.Based on the provided information and investigation outcome, it was presumed that tensile stress generated with removal had most likely contributed to the observed detachment of the subject guide wire.The applied stress would localize and therefore exceed the product design limit when the tip was being caught and restricted its movement by the heavily calcified cto.It was concluded that this event was not attributed to product quality.No capa will be taken.Instructions for use (ifu) states: [warnings]: observe movement of this guide wire in the vessels.Before this guide wire is moved or torqued, the tip movement should be examined and monitored under fluoroscopy.Do not move or torque the guide wire without observing corresponding movement of the tip; otherwise, the guide wire may be damaged and/or trauma may occur.In addition, ensure that the distal tip of this guide wire and its location in the vessel are visible during manipulations of the guide wire.Never push, auger, withdraw, or torque this guide wire that meets resistance.Torquing or pushing this guide wire against resistance may cause damage and/or tip separation of this guide wire or direct damage to a vessel.Resistance may be felt and/or observed under fluoroscopy by noting any buckling of the guide wire.If the prolapse of the guide wire tip is observed, do not allow the tip to remain in a prolapsed position; otherwise damage to the guide wire may occur.Determine the cause of resistance under fluoroscopy and take any necessary remedial action.If resistance is felt due to spasm, bending of the guide wire, or due to trap while operating this guide wire in the blood vessel or removing it, do not torque and/or pull the guide wire itself.Stop the procedure.Determine the cause of resistance under fluoroscopy and take appropriate remedial action.If the guide wire is moved excessively, it may break or become damaged, which may cause blood vessel injury or result in fragments being left inside the vessel.[malfunction and adverse effects]: separation of the guide wire.
|