|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.Since no lot number was provided, no manufacturing record evaluation could be performed.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: capsular contracture, deflation.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported that a 68-year-old female patient underwent a breast reconstruction with an unspecified mentor saline implant (left) and a 175cc mentor siltex round moderate profile saline breast prosthesis (right) and experienced bilateral deflations capsular contracture (baker grade 3/4) post-operatively, which was confirmed via a physical exam.As a result, the patient underwent explantation on (b)(6) 2022.This report is for the right side device.
|