| Model Number |
M00514200 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Positioning Problem (3009); Activation Failure (3270)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/11/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The complainant indicated that the ultraflex esophageal stent will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a device analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on july 25, 2022 that an ultraflex esophageal ng distal release covered stent was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.During the procedure, poor stent positioning was noted on the ultraflex esophageal stent.There were no patient complications reported due to this event.Note: no further information has been obtained despite good faith efforts.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blocks a2 (age at time of event), a3, a4, b1, b2 (outcomes attrib to adv event), b5, b7, d6a, e1 (initial reporter facility name, address 1, city, country, zip/post code, phone number), e3 (occupation), g2 (report source, report source other), h1, h6 (impact codes, device codes), h8 and h10 have been updated with additional information received august 23, 2022 and august 26, 2022.Block h6: medical device problem code a150101 captures the reportable event of ultraflex esophageal stent failure to expand.Block h10: the complainant indicated that the ultraflex esophageal stent was disposed and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore a device analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Block h11: b5 has been corrected.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on (b)(6) 2022 that an ultraflex esophageal ng distal release covered stent was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.During the procedure, the ultraflex esophageal stent was poorly position within the lesion.There were no patient complications reported due to this event.**additional information received on august 23, 2022 and august 26, 2022** note: this report pertains to one of two devices used on the same patient.Refer to manufacturer report # 3005099803-2022-04525 and 3005099803-2022-04526 for the associated device information.On (b)(6) 2022, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) procedure was performed and the previously implanted ultraflex esophageal stent ( the subject of mfr.Report# 3005099803-2022-04525) was removed from the patient with forceps.A second ultraflex esophageal stent (the subject of this report) was to be implanted to treat a 13cm malignant esophageal stricture.The patient's anatomy was tortuous and was not dilated prior to stent placement.During the procedure, the second ultraflex esophageal stent had only opened partially.The second ultraflex esophageal stent was removed from the patient and the procedure was completed with another ultraflex esophageal stent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation on july 25, 2022 that an ultraflex esophageal ng distal release covered stent was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.During the procedure, the ultraflex esophageal stent was poorly position within the lesion.There were no patient complications reported due to this event.Additional information received on august 23, 2022 and august 26, 2022: note: this report pertains to one of two devices used on the same patient.Refer to manufacturer report # 3005099803-2022-04525 and 3005099803-2022-04526 for the associated device information.On (b)(6) 2022, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (egd) procedure was performed and the previously implanted ultraflex esophageal stent (the subject of mfr.Report # 3005099803-2022-04525) was removed from the patient with forceps.A second ultraflex esophageal stent (the subject of this report) was to be implanted to treat a 13cm malignant esophageal stricture.The patient's anatomy was tortuous and was not dilated prior to stent placement.During the procedure, the second ultraflex esophageal stent had only opened partially.The second ultraflex esophageal stent was removed from the patient and the procedure was completed with another ultraflex esophageal stent.Additional information received on august 30, 2022: the previously implanted ultraflex esophageal stent (the subject of mfr.Report # 3005099803-2022-04525) had slipped up from the target anatomy.A second ultraflex esophageal stent ( subject of this report) was deployed and positioned below the previously implanted ultraflex esophageal stent; however, the second ultraflex esophageal stent (subject of this report) did not fully expand (partially opened).Both ultraflex esophagaeal stents were removed from the patient using grasping forceps.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block b5 has been updated with additional information received on august 30, 2022.Block h6: imdrf device code a150101 captures the reportable event of ultraflex esophageal stent failure to expand.Block h11: block b5 has also been corrected to include the manufacturer report # for the associated device information.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|