|
O&M HALYARD, INC. FLUIDSHIELD* 3 FOG-FREE PROCEDURE MASK WITH SO SOFT* LINING AND SO SOFT* EARLOOP; FLUIDSHIELD* LEVEL 3 FOG-FREE PROCEDURE MASK
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
47107 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Component Incompatible (1108)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Local Reaction (2035)
|
| Date of Event |
03/26/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product involved in the event reported has not been returned but a representative sample is anticipated.A follow-up report will be provided upon the conclusion of the investigation.All information reasonably known as of august 11, 2022 has been included in this medical device report.The information provided by o&m halyard, inc.Represents all of the known information at this time.O&m halyard, inc.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the o&m halyard, inc.Complaint database and identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a o&m halyard, inc.Product is defective or has caused serious injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Patient 3 of 4.Employee experienced reactions on four occasions associated with mask use.The reaction(s) consistent of tongue feeling thick with itchy throat.Initial reaction occurred on (b)(6) 2022 and subsequently on (b)(6) 2022, (b)(6) 2022 to (b)(6) 2022 and (b)(6) 2022 to (b)(6) 2022.Employee health prescribed intramuscular epinephrine, intravenous prednisone, benadryl, pepcid, solumedrol, and hydroxyzine.The employee followed up with an allergist and had two patch tests of steroids.Employee was referred to pulmonologist and rheumatologist.She currently continues benadryl, pepcid, solumedrol, hydroxyzine, 20 mg prednisone, allegra (twice a day), and zyrtec (twice a day) by mouth.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The representative product sample was returned to the failure analysis lab for evaluation.A representative sample was received for this complaint and evaluated by the failure analysis lab.The sample was evaluated under ambient light conditions.The visor of the sample arrived with creases and nicks.The visor appears worn and handled.The mask does not exhibit any sharp edges.The mask does not exhibit any loose fibers.The mask was found to be assembled according to the specification drawing.While the mask exhibits some signs of wear, as received in the lab, the failure analysis lab is unable to confirm the complaint of "reaction" experienced by the customer with the evaluation conducted in the lab.The device history records (dhr) evaluation was performed for the code 47107 and lot number am0285111 identified in the complaint.According to the documented records, the product was manufacturing according to the approved manufacturing procedures, specifications and then released by quality assurance.A quality nonconformance was not reported at the time of production.All information reasonably known as of september 26, 2022 has been included in this medical device report.The information provided by o&m halyard, inc.Represents all of the known information at this time.O&m halyard, inc.Has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the o&m halyard, inc.Complaint database and identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a o&m halyard, inc.Product is defective or has caused serious injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|