|
It was reported that, during an internal fixation surgery, a 1.5mm drill long with ao qc snapped off while using it inside the patient.The tip of the drill was left in patient bone.Surgery was resumed, without delay, using a s+n back-up device.No other complications were reported.
|
|
Section h6 was updated.Section h10: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, this case reports, the drill snapped off while in use inside a patient and a piece of the drill (¿tip) was left in the patient¿s bone.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested supporting clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.It has not been reported that the broken drill tip was removed from the patient¿s bone.The material composition of the drill is 17.4 ph stainless steel.The drills are manufactured and intended as externally communicating devices and are not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long-term implantation data is not available.The patient impact beyond possible micro-motion and/or migration, and local irritation/discomfort cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.This is a single use device, damage from misuse, excessive cleaning or rough handling are likely probable causes of the reported event.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Internal complaint reference number:.
|