| Model Number |
72202746 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/21/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy a biosure "wing" broke while implantation.Surgery was resumed after a non-significant delay with a back-up device used in the originally drilled bone hole, no voids were left in the patient.Bone quality was normal.The insertion site was prepared with a drill size 8mm same as the tunnel´s size.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and applicable tests were appropriately specified.A material certificate of analysis was required for the raw material.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.One of the wings is fractured at the distal end, another is deformed at the distal end the device has debris on it.A review of the customer provided image finds the complaint device with one wing fractured away from the device and another wing deformed, based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H2: additional information: b5 and h6: health effect - impact code.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy a biosure "wing" broke while implantation inside the patient.Surgery was resumed after a non-significant delay with a back-up device used in the originally drilled bone hole, no voids were left in the patient.Bone quality was normal and broken pieces of the device were retrieved with tweezers.The insertion site was prepared with a drill size 8mm same as the tunnel´s size.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.There was a relationship found between the device and the reported event.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and applicable tests were appropriately specified.A material certificate of analysis was required for the raw material.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.One of the wings is fractured at the distal end, another is deformed at the distal end the device has debris on it.A review of the customer provided image finds the complaint device with one wing fractured away from the device and another wing deformed, based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.Since no patient injuries are being reported no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|