It was reported that this device stored multiple ventricular tachycardia (vt) episodes that may have been inappropriate due to atrial fibrillation (af) with rapid ventricular response (rvr).In one episode, anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) was delivered, which induced a ventricular fibrillation (vf).The vf was successfully terminated with a 31 joule shock.A request was made for technical services to review the device data and episodes, to ensure appropriate device function.No adverse patient effects were reported.The device remains implanted and in service.Technical services reviewed the available data and episodes.The device initially inhibited the therapy as the detection enhancements indicated that rhythmid was correlated.At some point in time, an atrial beat was undersensed as it felt into cross-chamber blanking.This caused v>a to be true, and this overrules the other detection enhancements.The device then triggered atp that in turn induced a vf.The device detected it and issued a 31 j shock that successfully converted the arrhythmia.As the cross-chamber blanking is already set to smart, there is no option to shorten it even more (currently 15 ms).Other programming options would be to either increase the vt-1 cut-off zone to a value higher than what it is currently set.However, this raises the concern of not treating slow vts.Another possibility to be considered is to have v>a disabled as a detection enhancement.This would increase the likelihood of withholding therapy for this type of rhythm.
|