• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMBU A/S AMBU ASCOPE 4 BRONCHO LARGE; FLEXIBLE VIDEO BRONCHOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMBU A/S AMBU ASCOPE 4 BRONCHO LARGE; FLEXIBLE VIDEO BRONCHOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number 478001000
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Date of Event 07/28/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Ambu a/s has received a report from an germany customer about an ascope 4 broncho large from which the distal end broke off during use on a patient.The broken off part was succesfully removed from the patients lung by plumonologist on ermergency basis.Patient outcome was not affected.The defective product has not been returned for investigation due to contamination.Based on the investigation, the user reported that they that the patient was intubated with endotracheal tube size 7.5 mm - this is not an applicable size intubation tube for usage with the ascope 4 broncho large according to the ifu.According to the instruction for use (ifu) the minimum id (inner diameter) endotracheal tube size which can be used with ascope 4 broncho large is 7.0 mm.Hence, usage of a large intubation tube was ruled out and a wrong size of intubation tube can cause that the distal end of the scope can either get stuck or break off.In the complaint description provided by the user it was stated that upon pulling out the scope with great resistance, the distal end broke off.Based on the simulation test result, it was concluded that the distal end of the scope broke off when great resistance applied due to insuffucient lubricant or there is no further lubricant on the scope at the end of the procedure.According the product risk evaluation for the ascope 4 broncho, the likely cause of the resistance was that too little lubricant was applied to the endoscope before insertion.Hence the likely root cause of the reported failure was due to insufficient lubrication before insertion or there was no further lubricant on the scope at the end of the procedure.
 
Event or Problem Description
An ascope 4 broncho large was used on patient with a size 7.5 mm intubation tube.The distal end of the bronchoscope broke off during removal of the scope.The broken off piece had to be removed from the patients lung.Patient outcome was not affected by the incident as the piece was succesfully retrieved by the pulmonologists on an emergency basis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AMBU ASCOPE 4 BRONCHO LARGE
Common Device Name
FLEXIBLE VIDEO BRONCHOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMBU A/S
baltorpbakken 13
ballerup, 2750
DA  2750
Manufacturer (Section G)
AMBU A/S
baltorpbakken 13
ballerup 2750
DA   2750
Manufacturer Contact
menekse øzdemir
baltorpbakken 13
ballerup, 2750
DA   2750
MDR Report Key15247249
Report Number9610691-2022-00011
Device Sequence Number5681739
Product Code EOQ
UDI-Device Identifier05707480135530
UDI-Public05707480135530
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K173727
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 08/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2024
Device Model Number478001000
Device Catalogue Number478001000
Device Lot Number1000591990
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/28/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-