| Model Number |
1896-5050S |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture (2369)
|
| Date of Event |
05/09/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported a broken gamma3 nail (3525-0360s)."the patient was treated externally for a per/subtrochanteric left femur fracture on (b)(6) 2021 with a with a gamma nail.During the consultation (b)(6) 2022, the implant fracture was diagnosed and the patient was admitted to hip clinic at balgrist university hospital for further treatment.Here the indication for revision was given in case of symptomatic pseudarthrosis.The indication for revision was given and the patient had to undergo surgery on (b)(6) 2022." 7/22/2022 - additional information: upon product return, one locking screw was found broken.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported a broken gamma3 nail (3525-0360s)."the patient was treated externally for a per/subtrochanteric left femur fracture on (b)(6) 2021 with a with a gamma nail.During the consultation (b)(6) 2022, the implant fracture was diagnosed and the patient was admitted to hip clinic at (b)(6) hospital for further treatment.Here the indication for revision was given in case of symptomatic pseudarthrosis.The indication for revision was given and the patient had to undergo surgery on (b)(6) 2022." 7/22/2022 - additional information: upon product return, one locking screw was found broken.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event could be confirmed, since the received locking screw is broken apart as complained.The device inspection revealed the following: the visual inspection has shown that the locking screw is broken apart twice, the front fragment of the screw was not returned for evaluation.The thread flanks of the screw were partially flattened in the area where the screw was in contact with the nail, which indicates that the screw was exposed to high loads over a longer period of time in this area.Under the microscope the typical characteristics of a fatigue fracture can be identified at the fracture face.The origin of the crack is visible, there is a fatigue zone with a smooth surface and progression lines over almost the whole surface of the fracture and then we have a shear lip, where the final fracture occurred.The shiny surface on one side indicates that the fragments rubbed against each other after the breakage.The relevant dimensions were verified during the investigation and no deviation from the specification could be detected.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient related issue.The reported pseudarthrosis did finally lead to a fatigue failure of the implants.In this relation following statement from the instructions for use can be mentioned: ¿these devices can break when subjected to the increased loading associated with delayed unions and/or non-unions.Internal fixation devices are load sharing devices which are intended to hold fractured bone surfaces in apposition to facilitate healing.If healing is delayed or does not occur, the appliance may eventually break due to metal fatigue.Loads on the device produced by load bearing and the patient¿s activity level will dictate the longevity of the device." if updated information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|