|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a video was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: although the physical sample was not returned for evaluation, one electronic video was returned for evaluation.The video shows the clinician trying to inflate the tri-funnel g tube and leak was observed from different regions of the balloon.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported balloon rupture issues.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|