• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DFW150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Headache (1880); Visual Disturbances (2140); Insufficient Information (4580)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: unknown, not provided, but the best estimate date is between mar 7, 2022 and jun 17, 2022.The device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from patient's left eye as the patient was not happy with the results.The patient was unhappy with the "motion sickness/headaches/extreme light sensitivity" during post-op week 6 follow-up examination.He had complained about these symptoms earlier in the postoperative period with his referring optometrist (postop week 1-3).The pre-operative visual acuity was +3.00 -1.00 x 075 20/25.Glare 20/100 and that after the implantation with the original lens was plano -1.00 x 014 20/20-3.The patient was unhappy despite best corrected vision with mr.Another competitor lens of same diopter was used as the replacement and visual acuity post replacement was -0.50 spherical 20/20.The patient is now happy and visual complaints have completely resolved.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes, section d9: returned to manufacturer on: sep 6, 2022, section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection of the complaint lens revealed that it was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could contribute to or cause visual issues were identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.Conclusion: the reported complaint issues were not confirmed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15307582
Report Number3012236936-2022-02237
Device Sequence Number15074132
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474751255
UDI-Public(01)05050474751255(17)240330
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/30/2024
Device Model NumberDFW150
Device Catalogue NumberDFW150U195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/03/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/25/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/26/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/30/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight113 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-