• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX415T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (part # fx415t) was implanted during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in overdrainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on an unknown date.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 7 years, height: 129 centimeters (cm), weight: 28 kilograms (kg), gender: male.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: no significant deformations or damage of the valves were detected during the visual inspection.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that both valves are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over/under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operate within the accepted tolerance in both positions.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected.However, the breaking force required was not within the specified tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in progav 2.0 and in the shuntassistant®.Results: for the sake of thoroughness and transparency, we would like to point out that a permeability and a adjustability test was already carried out after the revision at the hospital.Existing deposits in the csf can temporarily impair the function of the valves and is described as concomitant symptoms in hydrocephalus therapy.Based on our examination results, we can determine an increased braking force at the time of our examination on the shunt system.The deposits found can be named as the cause of the increased braking force.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key15320592
Report Number3004721439-2022-00261
Device Sequence Number14733715
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906136574
UDI-Public4041906136574
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K161853
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 08/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFX415T
Device Catalogue NumberFX415T
Device Lot Number20037227
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/03/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/03/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/28/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age7 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight28 KG
-
-