• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZCB00
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/27/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Initial reporter name and address: telephone number: (b)(6).The intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain the missing information; however, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol), despite being correctly positioned, locked the cartridge, damaging the optical zone.It occurred during implantation/application.No further information provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection of the complaint lens revealed that it was stuck to a piece of tape.The lens was cleaned revealing damage on the edge of the lens.The code stuck in cartridge could not be confirmed due to no cartridge being received.No further issues were identified.The complaint issue "lens damaged" was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.The complaint issue "stuck in cartridge" was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15324605
Report Number3012236936-2022-02293
Device Sequence Number20134465
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474531840
UDI-Public(01)05050474531840(17)251008
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryBR
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/24/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/08/2025
Device Model NumberZCB00
Device Catalogue NumberZCB0000265
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/01/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/24/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/30/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/08/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age49 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-