| Model Number |
86-6023 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device catalog number is unknown; therefore, udi is unavailable.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Hcp reported to bfarm: "knee tep right side (b)(6) 2001 in neustadt because of varus gonarthrosis.Since the beginning of the year 2022 there is again pain in the right knee joint, since then also increasing bow-leg deformity.The patient is able to walk 200 meters without any aids under pain.Climbing stairs is laborious.Obese.Bmi 30.Knee tep left (b)(6) 2001.Radiological pe wear and loosening of tibia.Replacement surgery right knee on (b)(6) 2022.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # = > pc-(b)(4).Investigation summary = > the device associated with this report was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The photo investigation and visual examination confirmed the reported allegation.Heavy gross wear and a heavy fracture was found on one of the condyles on the device.Burnishing was found on the top surface of the tibial tray and wear on the bottom surface of the insert, which indicates there was movement between the tibial insert and tibial tray, however no sufficient evidence of disassociation was found.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot = > a device history record (dhr) review or manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not possible because the investigation was not able to retrieve the required lot code.Corrected: h3.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|