• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Crack (1135)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/25/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the surgeon noticed that the cartridge of the preloaded device was cracked while inserting into patient's left eye.Only the cartridge tip made contact with the eye.The device was removed and a new intraocular lens (iol) was opened.The patient has recovered.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Device evaluation: the complaint handpiece was received loose inside of a bag.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the handpiece was received with the lens stuck in the cartridge tip and with the plunger rod advanced up to the lens.A crack was observed that stretched from the tube to the tip of the cartridge.Inspection of the external assembly revealed that there were no gaps or issues that could contribute to the lens becoming stuck in the cartridge.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.The search revealed one additional investigation request (ir) for this production order number has been received, however, the issue could not be confirmed as related to manufacturing.Conclusion: the reported complaint issue was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15366843
Report Number3012236936-2022-02205
Device Sequence Number16549902
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731707
UDI-Public(01)05050474731707(17)240625
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 09/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/25/2024
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0175
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/13/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/14/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-