• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/15/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.If explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.First/given name: only provided as first initial a.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after insertion into the left eye (os), it was noticed by the surgeon that the haptic was missing from the intraocular lens (iol).The iol was removed and replaced with another johnson & johnson lens, model dib00 13.5 diopter.There was no patient injury and no additional surgical intervention was required.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 10/5/2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received loose inside of the original folding carton.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half and with a detached haptic.The lens was cleaned and, no further issues were identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.Inspection of the handpiece revealed that the cartridge tip was damaged, in a way consistent with a handpiece that was dropped.No further issues were identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15375470
Report Number3012236936-2022-02301
Device Sequence Number12119882
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731622
UDI-Public(01)05050474731622(17)240503
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateSC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/03/2024
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0135
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/15/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/08/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/07/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/03/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight103 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-