• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 1-2 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 1-2 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 71453201
Medical Device Problem Code Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Joint Laxity (4526)
Date of Event 08/18/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a tka had been performed on (b)(6) 2021, the patient experienced disassociation of the poly.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022, to exchange the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 1-2 9mm.Patient's current health status is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6.The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device did not confirm the stated failure mode.The device was found to be slightly discolored from exposure to bodily fluids.A small portion of the base is also damaged.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that the patient experienced a disassociation of the poly insert.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery, to exchange the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 1-2 9mm.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.The patient's current condition is unknown, and the patient impact could not be determined based on the limited information provided.Should any additional clinical information be provided, this complaint will be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include bone degeneration, lack of ingrowth, surgical technique, patient anatomy, abnormal loading and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device did not confirm the stated failure mode.The device was found to be slightly discolored from exposure to bodily fluids.A small portion of the base is also damaged.The lab analysis concluded that the purpose of this investigation was to examine the returned device.No destructive analysis was conducted.Damage/deformation was observed on the distal surface and posterior lock detail and the anterior lock detail of the insert.Burnishing, likely due to contact with the femoral component during service, was observed on the post.Damage/deformation of the lock is consistent with the insert not being properly engaged during the duration of service.Whether the insert became disengaged during service or was not fully engaged at initial implantation could not be definitively determined during this investigation.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that the patient experienced a disassociation of the poly insert.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery, to exchange the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 1-2 9mm.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.The patient's current condition is unknown, and the patient impact could not be determined based on the limited information provided.Should any additional clinical information be provided, this complaint will be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include bone degeneration, lack of ingrowth, surgical technique, patient anatomy, abnormal loading and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 1-2 9MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15380848
Report Number1020279-2022-04014
Device Sequence Number20190993
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556033784
UDI-Public00885556033784
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K071071
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number71453201
Device Catalogue Number71453201
Device Lot Number21BM14974
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/07/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/07/2022
01/24/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/08/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/12/2022
01/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/26/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-