SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 1-2 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 71453201 |
Device Problem
Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395)
|
Patient Problem
Joint Laxity (4526)
|
Event Date 08/18/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, after a tka had been performed on (b)(6) 2021, the patient experienced disassociation of the poly.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022, to exchange the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 1-2 9mm.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6.The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device did not confirm the stated failure mode.The device was found to be slightly discolored from exposure to bodily fluids.A small portion of the base is also damaged.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that the patient experienced a disassociation of the poly insert.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery, to exchange the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 1-2 9mm.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.The patient's current condition is unknown, and the patient impact could not be determined based on the limited information provided.Should any additional clinical information be provided, this complaint will be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include bone degeneration, lack of ingrowth, surgical technique, patient anatomy, abnormal loading and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device did not confirm the stated failure mode.The device was found to be slightly discolored from exposure to bodily fluids.A small portion of the base is also damaged.The lab analysis concluded that the purpose of this investigation was to examine the returned device.No destructive analysis was conducted.Damage/deformation was observed on the distal surface and posterior lock detail and the anterior lock detail of the insert.Burnishing, likely due to contact with the femoral component during service, was observed on the post.Damage/deformation of the lock is consistent with the insert not being properly engaged during the duration of service.Whether the insert became disengaged during service or was not fully engaged at initial implantation could not be definitively determined during this investigation.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that the patient experienced a disassociation of the poly insert.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery, to exchange the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 1-2 9mm.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.The patient's current condition is unknown, and the patient impact could not be determined based on the limited information provided.Should any additional clinical information be provided, this complaint will be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include bone degeneration, lack of ingrowth, surgical technique, patient anatomy, abnormal loading and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|