|
Model Number U4150415RX |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Rupture (1546); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/22/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of chronic total occlusion in the superficial femoral artery via a contralateral approach, the pta balloon allegedly ruptured at nominal pressure and also the guidewire was bent at the same time.It was further reported that there was resistance felt upon the balloon was retracing and the shaft was found to be torn.Reportedly, the balloon and the guidewire were removed as one unit.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 03/2025).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of chronic total occlusion in the superficial femoral artery via a contralateral approach, the pta balloon allegedly ruptured at 6 atm.It was further reported that there was difficulty in retracting the balloon through the introducer sheath and the device and introducer sheath removed as one unit.Reportedly, there was resistance felt upon when the balloon was retracting and the shaft was found to be torn.Reportedly, the balloon and the guidewire were removed as one unit.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one ultraverse rx pta dilatation catheter was received for evaluation.During visual evaluation, the entire length of the catheter was examined for damage revealing a longitudinal tear to the clear portion of the catheter.The guidewire lumen and core-wire were exposed.The inner guidewire lumen had twisting, stretching, and bunching.No rupture was noted to the balloon.No functional testing was performed due to the condition of the sample.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported shaft tear as a longitudinal tear was noted to the clear portion of the catheter.However, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported balloon rupture as there was no rupture seen on the balloon.Additionally, the investigation is inconclusive for both the reported sheath and guidewire removal difficulty as functional testing could not be performed due to the condition of the sample.A definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture, sheath removal difficulty, guidewire removal difficulty and shaft tear could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one ultraverse rx pta dilatation catheter was received for evaluation.During visual evaluation, the entire length of the catheter was examined for damage revealing a longitudinal tear to the clear portion of the catheter.The guidewire lumen and core-wire were exposed.The inner guidewire lumen had twisting, stretching, and bunching.No rupture was noted to the balloon.No functional testing was performed due to the condition of the sample.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported shaft tear as a longitudinal tear was noted to the clear portion of the catheter.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported balloon rupture as functional testing for the same could not be performed due to the condition of the catheter.Additionally, the investigation is inconclusive for both the reported sheath and guidewire removal difficulty as functional testing could not be performed due to the condition of the sample.A definitive root cause for the reported balloon rupture, sheath removal difficulty, guidewire removal difficulty and shaft tear could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiration date: 03/2025), g3.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure of chronic total occlusion in the superficial femoral artery via a contralateral approach, the pta balloon allegedly ruptured at 6 atm.It was further reported that there was difficulty in retracting the balloon through the introducer sheath and the device and introducer sheath removed as one unit.Reportedly, there was resistance felt upon when the balloon was retracting and the shaft was found to be torn.Reportedly, the balloon and the guidewire were removed as one unit.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|