Date of event: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.(b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the device analysis, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
Block b3: approximated based on the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Block d4, h4: the complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.Block h6 (device codes): medical device problem code a0401 captures the reportable event of cutting wire broken.Block h10: the returned autotome rx 44 was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the cutting wire was broken and kinked from the proximal pierced hole.The device was observed under magnification and the cutting wire was found to be blackened and the working length was torn from the end of the rapid exchange (rx) channel to the tip.No other problems with the device were noted.The reported event of cutting wire break was confirmed.Upon analysis, it was found that the cutting wire was broken, kinked, and blackened.The cutting wire being blackened indicates that the device was energized.Based on the condition of the device, the problem found could have been generated if there was contact between the device and the scope during energization or if the generator exceeded the maximum of voltage during the procedure.Also, energizing the device prior to performing sphincterotomy can compromise the cutting wire's integrity and cause a premature cutting wire fatigue.Additionally, a kink/bend in the cutting wire can cause the cutting wire to break.Once the cutting wire breaks, any attempt to remove the device from the scope can lead to the broken section hitting the working channel of the scope.This can kink the cutting wire.Additionally, the working length was torn from the end of the rx channel to the tip.This was likely generated when the user pulled/removed the guidewire through the c-channel, or by the technique used during loading/removing the guidewire.It is most likely that procedural or anatomical factors encountered during the use of the device could have affected the device performance and its integrity.Based on all gathered information, the most probable root cause of this complaint is adverse event related to procedure.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device was unable to be performed as the lot number is unknown.However, a ship history review was performed to identify the most probable lots, and a device history review (dhr) on the most probable lots did not identify any anomalies or deviations within manufacturing/service processes that could have contributed to the event.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|