|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no indication of a lot specific product quality issue.Based on the information provided, the investigation determined that the reported balloon rupture was likely due to circumstances of the procedure.It is likely that the rupture occurred due to interaction with the heavily calcified superficial femoral artery that was 80% stenosed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.The additional armada 18 referenced is filed under separate medwatch report number.
|