• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3MAXC
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Unraveled Material (1664); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/23/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the right middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a penumbra system 3max reperfusion catheter (3maxc), a guide catheter, and a 0.035¿ guidewire.During the procedure, the physician gained access to the target vessel via right radial artery using the guide catheter.Then, the physician completed one pass in the target vessel using the red72, 3maxc, and guide catheter.While retracting the red72 and 3maxc through the guide catheter, the physician experienced resistance and broke the red72 and 3maxc at the mid-shaft.It was also reported that both devices became unraveled at the mid-shaft and the guide catheter became kinked.The physician then advanced the guidewire into the 3maxc and red72 and removed both devices successfully.The procedure was completed using a new 3maxc, a 6fr non-penumbra catheter, and a new guide catheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 1.3005168196-2022-00425.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed that the catheter was fractured.Evaluation revealed stretching at the fracture site.If the red72 is retracted against resistance during use, the device may stretch and subsequently fracture.The root cause of resistance during the procedure could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed kinks in the distal fractured segment, and the supported coil winds unraveled and wrapped around the non-penumbra guidewire.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and the root cause could not be determined.Evaluation of the returned 3maxc could not confirm that the catheter was fractured.Evaluation reveled bends along the distal shaft of the catheter.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and the root cause could not be determined.The 3maxc was advanced through a demonstration red72 without an issue during evaluation.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report number: 1.3005168196-2022-00425.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM 3MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key15420396
Report Number3005168196-2022-00426
Device Sequence Number16780471
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019956
UDI-Public814548019956
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K160449
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/28/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/04/2025
Device Catalogue Number3MAXC
Device Lot NumberF00000545
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/23/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/07/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/14/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/05/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-