• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PHENOM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PHENOM Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-FG
Device Problem No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/27/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Medtronic received a report that the pipeline was delivered to the microcatheter, when the tip of the pipeline came out from the mic rocatheter, the pipeline's delivery wire could be pushed, but when it was pulled, the position of the pipeline did not change.It was possible that the pipeline was disconnected from the proximal bumper part, so the pipeline was removed for each microcatheter.The procedure was completed successfully using the same size of pipeline and a new microcatheter.No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured aneurysm in the internal carotid-para.It was noted the p atient's vessel tortuosity was moderate.Dapt (dual antiplatelet treatment) was administered.There were no postoperative findings related to blood flow imaging.The pipeline was used for on-label use and it was prepared as indicated in the package insert.Ancillary devices include a phenom27 150cm microcatheter.Additional information received reported that it was confirmed under fluoroscopy that the pipeline was disconnected from the proximal bumper part.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis #705039375:equipment used: video inspection system (m-81850), ruler (m-83360), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5), 0.0265¿ mandrel drawing(s) referenced: dwgsfg15xxx-yyyy-zz rev f as found condition: the pipeline flex w/ shield device and phenom-27 micro catheter were returned for analysis within a shipping box and within two resealable plastic biohazard pouches.The already deployed braid was returned further within a third resealable plastic biohazard pouch.Visual inspection/damage location details: the phenom-27 micro catheter hub was separated from the micro catheter and not returned for analysis.The separated edge was found stretched and jagged and therefore likely due to tensile failure.No damages or irregularities were found with the remaining micro catheter body, distal tip or marker band.The pipeline flex w/ shield pusher was found within the micro catheter with the tip coil and dps sleeves found extending out the catheter tip.Resistance was encountered when attempting to retracting the pusher back within the micro catheter and was advanced out.Dried blood was found throughout the micro catheter and on the pipeline flex w/ shield pusher.The hypotube was intact and unstretched and ptfe shrink tubing was found undamaged.No damages were found with the pad restraint, re-sheathing pad or with the proximal bumper.The distal and proximal dps restraints and dps sleeves were found intact.The tip coil was found undamaged.Both braid ends were found fully opened, damaged, and frayed.The middle braid was found slightly damaged.Testing/analysis: the phenom-027 micro catheter segment was measured to be ~153.0cm.As the hub and strain relief were not returned for analysis, confirmation to length specifications could not be determined.The inner diameter was measured to be 0.0265¿ at both ends which is within specification and compatible for use with the pipeline flex w/ shield.The catheter was then tested by running an in-house 0.0265¿ mandrel through microcatheter.The mandrel was inserted into the catheter hub, through the catheter body and out the distal end with resistance encountered throughout.Dried blood was pushed out with the mandrel.Conclusion: based on the analysis findings, the customer report of ¿delivery system stuck during retraction¿ was confirmed.In-house testing found the pusher had resistance within the micro catheter at the dps sleeves.No damages or irregularities were found with the sleeve or micro catheter tip that would contribute towards the resistance and no nonconformance to specification was found.It is likely the dried blood contributed towards the resistance as resistance was encountered due to the blood during in-house testing.The customer report of ¿device opens prematurely¿ could not be confirmed through device analysis as the device was returned with the braid already deployed.It is likely the premature deployment is caused by the reported resistance.Other possible contributors for premature deployment are, high force delivery, operator did not have the sheath properly seated in hub of micro catheter, over-manipulation, pusher torqued/pulled back during insertion or advancing ped inside micro catheter, or user resheaths more than two times.The braid was found damaged, potentially contributing towards the resistance and premature deployment.It is also possible that the damage occurred due to retracting the device against the reported resistance.As the braid was returned already deployed and unprotected, it is not known how much damage had occurred during the procedure.The micro catheter was found broken near the hub and strain relief, potentially caused by the reported resistance.Ngod10 2022-08-28 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PHENOM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key15440090
MDR Text Key305885649
Report Number2029214-2022-01573
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/16/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-FG
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-FG
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/28/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-