• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH DISTAL LATERAL FIBULA PLATE, 5 HOLE; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH DISTAL LATERAL FIBULA PLATE, 5 HOLE; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 40-20905
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/08/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a surgery took place on (b)(6) 2022 due to the patient breaking their leg while riding a bicycle with his son.Follow up on the (b)(6) 2022 and patient took a picture of the x-rays.The screws are screwed into the plate but the plate is not screwed into the patient's bone.There is a gap between the patient's bone and the plate.Surgeon did not screw in screws all the away per what patient saw on the x-rays.When the patient asked the physician he mentioned that he used a locking screw and told the patient that it is no big deal.Patient is adamant about not notifying the physician involved of his inquiry into this event.He will be following up with another surgeon to seek another opinion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the available information the device will not be returned therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.A review of the device history is not possible because the lot number was not communicated.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a surgery took place on 08-aug-2022 due to the patient breaking their leg while riding a bicycle with his son.Follow up on the (b)(6) 2022 and patient took a picture of the x-rays.The screws are screwed into the plate but the plate is not screwed into the patient's bone.There is a gap between the patient's bone and the plate.Surgeon did not screw in screws all the away per what patient saw on the x-rays.When the patient asked the physician he mentioned that he used a locking screw and told the patient that it is no big deal.Patient is adamant about not notifying the physician involved of his inquiry into this event.He will be following up with another surgeon to seek another opinion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed for the screws, all visible screws are in placed in the plate as required although there is a gap between the plate is visible on the received x-rays.The affected devices were not returned for evaluation, therefore no further investigation of the reported devices is possible.The complaint including patient questions was forwarded to medical affairs for review with following result: it can be said that satisfactory fracture healing is possible even with this plate positioning.The colleague is basically right when he says that the plate does not have to be in contact proximally.This is not absolutely necessary with angle-stable construct.The current position is not necessarily unacceptable and should therefore be adjusted.This depends on the further follow up and the upcoming x-ray.The image does show a persisting fracture gap, which is difficult to assess regarding the effect this may have for the upcoming healing.At the distal end of the plate as well as around the screws there seems to be some light zones within the surrounding bone which could be interpreted as a loosening area.However, with an interval of only one week between the operation and the control x-ray, the prognostic value is quite low.In general it can be mentioned that if we have notice, that a surgeon is using a stryker product wrong systematically we would reach out and try to support to improve the quality of care.This case can definitely not be assessed with the given information.It seems as if in this given case the relationship of trust between doctor and patient is permanently impaired.The patient should seek a second opinion by another surgeon in this case.We, as the manufacture cannot decide whether or not a surgical measurement is in need of revision (especially only with x-ray).A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Based on the provided information, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue in regards to the placement of the implants.No product related issue could be detected.In this context following statements of the instructions for use can be pointed out: ¿responsibility for proper selection of patients, adequate training, experience in the choice and placement of implants and the decision to leave or remove implants postoperatively, rests with the surgeon.Responsibility for choosing where and how bones are repositioned rests with the surgeon.¿ if the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DISTAL LATERAL FIBULA PLATE, 5 HOLE
Type of Device
APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
SZ  2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG
boetzingerstr. 41
postfach
freiburg D-791 11
GM   D-79111
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key15473837
MDR Text Key306255423
Report Number0008031020-2022-00469
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KTT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K081284
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number40-20905
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/26/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/23/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/22/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age45 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight118 KG
-
-