|
|
| Model Number |
71675517 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Inflammation (1932); Discomfort (2330)
|
| Date of Event |
06/13/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Smith & nephew is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 c.F.R.Part 803.This report may be based upon information which smith & nephew has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, smith & nephew, or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, smith & nephew or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Case (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after an internal fixation procedure had been performed on the patient's left femur on (b)(6) 2017 to treat a trochanteric fracture, the patient experienced pain in the back, in the knee and in the lateral hip over the greater trochanter.Along with this symptom, the patient also experienced trochanteric bursitis of the left hip and the breakage of one (1) distal screw.The patient received a steroid injection in or around (b)(6) 2018, but there is no evidence of how was the screw fracture addressed.Additional details regarding the clinical course of the patient were not provided.This incident was noticed in a retrospective post-market clinical follow up activity (pmcf)], additional information is not known, and it is not possible to collect it, we do not have the opportunity to revisit negative feedback to retrieve further information.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Given the nature of the alleged incident, the device, could not be returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on a review of the information provided, this incident was noticed in a retrospective post-market clinical follow up activity pmcf, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the event.It was reported the patient received a steroid injection in or around 13-jun-2018, but there is no evidence of how the screw fracture was addressed.Therefore, the causal relationship between the s&n device and the reported issue cannot be determined.Subsequently, the impact to the patient beyond the reported pain in the back, in the knee and in the lateral hip over the greater trochanter, trochanteric bursitis of the left hip and the breakage of one (1) distal screw cannot be confirmed nor concluded.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for intramedullary nail system revealed that provides complete guidelines of indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions and possible adverse effects that may occur preoperative, during surgery or post operative.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, joint tightness, patient condition or postoperative care.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: given the nature of the alleged incident, the devices could not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the reported events could not be concluded.However, we are unable to rule out the patient¿s fall history (including the reported fall that took place in (b)(6) 2017), the patients comorbidities/ medical history as a contributing factor to the reported events or just the time in situ as it was over a year later it was noted.Furthermore, it cannot be concluded there was a mal performance of the implant or an implant failure.The patient impact is determined to be retained broken implantable screw, pain in the back, knee, and lateral hip over the greater trochanter.Local irritation/discomfort, and/or migration should not be ruled out.The devices' batch numbers were not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed devices.A review of the instructions for use documents for intramedullary nail system reveals in the adverse events that tissue reactions which include macrophage and foreign body reactions adjacent to implants can occur.A review of the risk management files revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to these products and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the products failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, joint tightness or patient condition.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|